Don Bell Don Bell's Profilseite

About Me

Full Name

Don Bell Don Bell

Bio

AWS-Certified-Machine-Learning-Specialty Certification Materials - AWS-Certified-Machine-Learning-Specialty Valid Dump

P.S. Free & New AWS-Certified-Machine-Learning-Specialty dumps are available on Google Drive shared by PDFTorrent: https://drive.google.com/open?id=1JAcxL9KDU4L7GZCdRGvhMrpOtSWIX0zf

Many candidates find the Amazon AWS-Certified-Machine-Learning-Specialty exam preparation difficult. They often buy expensive study courses to start their AWS Certified Machine Learning - Specialty (AWS-Certified-Machine-Learning-Specialty) certification exam preparation. However, spending a huge amount on such resources is difficult for many Amazon exam applicants. The latest Amazon AWS-Certified-Machine-Learning-Specialty Exam Dumps are the right option for you to prepare for the AWS-Certified-Machine-Learning-Specialty certification test at home. PDFTorrent has launched the AWS-Certified-Machine-Learning-Specialty exam dumps with the collaboration of world-renowned professionals.

The AWS Certified Machine Learning - Specialty certification exam covers a variety of topics, including data engineering, data preprocessing, modeling, deep learning, and deployment. Candidates will be tested on their ability to understand and use various AWS services, such as Amazon SageMaker, AWS Lambda, AWS Glue, and AWS Kinesis, among others. They will also need to demonstrate their expertise in designing and implementing machine learning algorithms, as well as their ability to troubleshoot and optimize machine learning models.

Understanding functional and technical aspects of AWS Certified Machine Learning Specialty Exam Modeling

The following will be dicussed here:

Frame business problems as machine learning problems
Perform hyperparameter optimization
Evaluate machine learning models
Select the appropriate model(s) for a given machine learning problem
Train machine learning models

>> AWS-Certified-Machine-Learning-Specialty Certification Materials <<

Pass-Sure AWS-Certified-Machine-Learning-Specialty – 100% Free Certification Materials | AWS-Certified-Machine-Learning-Specialty Valid Dump

It is difficult to get the AWS-Certified-Machine-Learning-Specialty certification for you need have extremely high concentration to have all test sites in mind. Our AWS-Certified-Machine-Learning-Specialty learning questions can successfully solve this question for the content are exactly close to the changes of the real exam. When you grasp the key points, nothing will be difficult for you anymore. Our professional experts are good at compiling the AWS-Certified-Machine-Learning-Specialty training guide with the most important information. Believe in us, and your success is 100% guaranteed!

Amazon AWS Certified Machine Learning - Specialty Sample Questions (Q293-Q298):

NEW QUESTION # 293
A data scientist is training a text classification model by using the Amazon SageMaker built-in BlazingText algorithm. There are 5 classes in the dataset, with 300 samples for category A, 292 samples for category B,
240 samples for category C, 258 samples for category D, and 310 samples for category E.
The data scientist shuffles the data and splits off 10% for testing. After training the model, the data scientist generates confusion matrices for the training and test sets.
What could the data scientist conclude form these results?

A. The data distribution is skewed.
B. Classes C and D are too similar.
C. The dataset is too small for holdout cross-validation.
D. The model is overfitting for classes B and E.

Answer: D

Explanation:
A confusion matrix is a matrix that summarizes the performance of a machine learning model on a set of test data. It displays the number of true positives (TP), true negatives (TN), false positives (FP), and false negatives (FN) produced by the model on the test data1. For multi-class classification, the matrix shape will be equal to the number of classes i.e for n classes it will be nXn1. The diagonal values represent the number of correct predictions for each class, and the off-diagonal values represent the number of incorrect predictions for each class1.
The BlazingText algorithm is a proprietary machine learning algorithm for forecasting time series using causal convolutional neural networks (CNNs). BlazingText works best with large datasets containing hundreds of time series. It accepts item metadata, and is the only Forecast algorithm that accepts related time series data without future values2.
From the confusion matrices for the training and test sets, we can observe the following:
* The model has a high accuracy on the training set, as most of the diagonal values are high and the off- diagonal values are low. This means that the model is able to learn the patterns and features of the training data well.
* However, the model has a lower accuracy on the test set, as some of the diagonal values are lower and some of the off-diagonal values are higher. This means that the model is not able to generalize well to the unseen data and makes more errors.
* The model has a particularly high error rate for classes B and E on the test set, as the values of M_22 and M_55 are much lower than the values of M_12, M_21, M_15, M_25, M_51, and M_52. This means that the model is confusing classes B and E with other classes more often than it should.
* The model has a relatively low error rate for classes A, C, and D on the test set, as the values of M_11, M_33, and M_44 are high and the values of M_13, M_14, M_23, M_24, M_31, M_32, M_34, M_41, M_42, and M_43 are low. This means that the model is able to distinguish classes A, C, and D from other classes well.
These results indicate that the model is overfitting for classes B and E, meaning that it is memorizing the specific features of these classes in the training data, but failing to capture the general features that are applicable to the test data. Overfitting is a common problem in machine learning, where the model performs well on the training data, but poorly on the test data3. Some possible causes of overfitting are:
* The model is too complex or has too many parameters for the given data. This makes the model flexible enough to fit the noise and outliers in the training data, but reduces its ability to generalize to new data.
* The data is too small or not representative of the population. This makes the model learn from a limited or biased sample of data, but fails to capture the variability and diversity of the population.
* The data is imbalanced or skewed. This makes the model learn from a disproportionate or uneven distribution of data, but fails to account for the minority or rare classes.
Some possible solutions to prevent or reduce overfitting are:
* Simplify the model or use regularization techniques. This reduces the complexity or the number of parameters of the model, and prevents it from fitting the noise and outliers in the data. Regularization techniques, such as L1 or L2 regularization, add a penalty term to the loss function of the model, which shrinks the weights of the model and reduces overfitting3.
* Increase the size or diversity of the data. This provides more information and examples for the model to learn from, and increases its ability to generalize to new data. Data augmentation techniques, such as rotation, flipping, cropping, or noise addition, can generate new data from the existing data by applying some transformations3.
* Balance or resample the data. This adjusts the distribution or the frequency of the data, and ensures that the model learns from all classes equally. Resampling techniques, such as oversampling or undersampling, can create a balanced dataset by increasing or decreasing the number of samples for each class3.
Confusion Matrix in Machine Learning - GeeksforGeeks
BlazingText algorithm - Amazon SageMaker
Overfitting and Underfitting in Machine Learning - GeeksforGeeks

NEW QUESTION # 294
An aircraft engine manufacturing company is measuring 200 performance metrics in a time-series. Engineers want to detect critical manufacturing defects in near-real time during testing. All of the data needs to be stored for offline analysis.
What approach would be the MOST effective to perform near-real time defect detection?

A. Use Amazon S3 for ingestion, storage, and further analysis. Use the Amazon SageMaker Random Cut Forest (RCF) algorithm to determine anomalies.
B. Use AWS IoT Analytics for ingestion, storage, and further analysis. Use Jupyter notebooks from within AWS IoT Analytics to carry out analysis for anomalies.
C. Use Amazon Kinesis Data Firehose for ingestion and Amazon Kinesis Data Analytics Random Cut Forest (RCF) to perform anomaly detection. Use Kinesis Data Firehose to store data in Amazon S3 for further analysis.
D. Use Amazon S3 for ingestion, storage, and further analysis. Use an Amazon EMR cluster to carry out Apache Spark ML k-means clustering to determine anomalies.

Answer: C

Explanation:
Explanation
The company wants to perform near-real time defect detection on a time-series of 200 performance metrics, and store all the data for offline analysis. The best approach for this scenario is to use Amazon Kinesis Data Firehose for ingestion and Amazon Kinesis Data Analytics Random Cut Forest (RCF) to perform anomaly detection. Use Kinesis Data Firehose to store data in Amazon S3 for further analysis.
Amazon Kinesis Data Firehose is a service that can capture, transform, and deliver streaming data to destinations such as Amazon S3, Amazon Redshift, Amazon OpenSearch Service, and Splunk. Kinesis Data Firehose can handle any amount and frequency of data, and automatically scale to match the throughput. Kinesis Data Firehose can also compress, encrypt, and batch the data before delivering it to the destination, reducing the storage cost and enhancing the security.
Amazon Kinesis Data Analytics is a service that can analyze streaming data in real time using SQL or Apache Flink applications. Kinesis Data Analytics can use built-in functions and algorithms to perform various analytics tasks, such as aggregations, joins, filters, windows, and anomaly detection. One of the built-in algorithms that Kinesis Data Analytics supports is Random Cut Forest (RCF), which is a supervised learning algorithm for forecasting scalar time series using recurrent neural networks. RCF can detect anomalies in streaming data by assigning an anomaly score to each data point, based on how distant it is from the rest of the data. RCF can handle multiple related time series, such as the performance metrics of the aircraft engine, and learn a global model that captures the common patterns and trends across the time series.
Therefore, the company can use the following architecture to build the near-real time defect detection solution:
Use Amazon Kinesis Data Firehose for ingestion: The company can use Kinesis Data Firehose to capture the streaming data from the aircraft engine testing, and deliver it to two destinations:
Amazon S3 and Amazon Kinesis Data Analytics. The company can configure the Kinesis Data Firehose delivery stream to specify the source, the buffer size and interval, the compression and encryption options, the error handling and retry logic, and the destination details.
Use Amazon Kinesis Data Analytics Random Cut Forest (RCF) to perform anomaly detection:
The company can use Kinesis Data Analytics to create a SQL application that can read the streaming data from the Kinesis Data Firehose delivery stream, and apply the RCF algorithm to detect anomalies. The company can use the RANDOM_CUT_FOREST or RANDOM_CUT_FOREST_WITH_EXPLANATION functions to compute the anomaly scores and attributions for each data point, and use the WHERE clause to filter out the normal data points. The company can also use the CURSOR function to specify the input stream, and the PUMP function to write the output stream to another destination, such as Amazon Kinesis Data Streams or AWS Lambda.
Use Kinesis Data Firehose to store data in Amazon S3 for further analysis: The company can use Kinesis Data Firehose to store the raw and processed data in Amazon S3 for offline analysis. The company can use the S3 destination of the Kinesis Data Firehose delivery stream to store the raw data, and use another Kinesis Data Firehose delivery stream to store the output of the Kinesis Data Analytics application. The company can also use AWS Glue or Amazon Athena to catalog, query, and analyze the data in Amazon S3.
References:
What Is Amazon Kinesis Data Firehose?
What Is Amazon Kinesis Data Analytics for SQL Applications?
DeepAR Forecasting Algorithm - Amazon SageMaker

NEW QUESTION # 295
A retail company is selling products through a global online marketplace. The company wants to use machine learning (ML) to analyze customer feedback and identify specific areas for improvement. A developer has built a tool that collects customer reviews from the online marketplace and stores them in an Amazon S3 bucket. This process yields a dataset of 40 reviews. A data scientist building the ML models must identify additional sources of data to increase the size of the dataset.
Which data sources should the data scientist use to augment the dataset of reviews? (Choose three.)

A. Social media posts containing the name of the company or its products
B. Emails exchanged by customers and the company's customer service agents
C. Instruction manuals for the company's products
D. A publicly available collection of news articles
E. Product sales revenue figures for the company
F. A publicly available collection of customer reviews

Answer: A,C,F

NEW QUESTION # 296
A company needs to deploy a chatbot to answer common questions from customers. The chatbot must base its answers on company documentation.
Which solution will meet these requirements with the LEAST development effort?

A. Train an Amazon SageMaker BlazingText model based on past customer questions and company documents. Deploy the model as a real-time SageMaker endpoint. Integrate the model with the chatbot by using the SageMaker Runtime InvokeEndpoint API operation to answer customer questions.
B. Train a Bidirectional Attention Flow (BiDAF) network based on past customer questions and company documents. Deploy the model as a real-time Amazon SageMaker endpoint. Integrate the model with the chatbot by using the SageMaker Runtime InvokeEndpoint API operation to answer customer questions.
C. Index company documents by using Amazon OpenSearch Service. Integrate the chatbot with OpenSearch Service by using the OpenSearch Service k-nearest neighbors (k-NN) Query API operation to answer customer questions.
D. Index company documents by using Amazon Kendra. Integrate the chatbot with Amazon Kendra by using the Amazon Kendra Query API operation to answer customer questions.

Answer: D

Explanation:
The solution A will meet the requirements with the least development effort because it uses Amazon Kendra, which is a highly accurate and easy to use intelligent search service powered by machine learning. Amazon Kendra can index company documents from various sources and formats, such as PDF, HTML, Word, and more. Amazon Kendra can also integrate with chatbots by using the Amazon Kendra Query API operation, which can understand natural language questions and provide relevant answers from the indexed documents. Amazon Kendra can also provide additional information, such as document excerpts, links, and FAQs, to enhance the chatbot experience1.
The other options are not suitable because:
* Option B: Training a Bidirectional Attention Flow (BiDAF) network based on past customer questions and company documents, deploying the model as a real-time Amazon SageMaker endpoint, and integrating the model with the chatbot by using the SageMaker Runtime InvokeEndpoint API operation will incur more development effort than using Amazon Kendra. The company will have to write the code for the BiDAF network, which is a complex deep learning model for question answering. The company will also have to manage the SageMaker endpoint, the model artifact, and the inference logic2.
* Option C: Training an Amazon SageMaker BlazingText model based on past customer questions and company documents, deploying the model as a real-time SageMaker endpoint, and integrating the model with the chatbot by using the SageMaker Runtime InvokeEndpoint API operation will incur more development effort than using Amazon Kendra. The company will have to write the code for the BlazingText model, which is a fast and scalable text classification and word embedding algorithm. The company will also have to manage the SageMaker endpoint, the model artifact, and the inference logic3.
* Option D: Indexing company documents by using Amazon OpenSearch Service and integrating the chatbot with OpenSearch Service by using the OpenSearch Service k-nearest neighbors (k-NN) Query API operation will not meet the requirements effectively. Amazon OpenSearch Service is a fully managed service that provides fast and scalable search and analytics capabilities. However, it is not designed for natural language question answering, and it may not provide accurate or relevant answers for the chatbot. Moreover, the k-NN Query API operation is used to find the most similar documents or vectors based on a distance function, not to find the best answers based on a natural language query4.
1: Amazon Kendra
2: Bidirectional Attention Flow for Machine Comprehension
3: Amazon SageMaker BlazingText
4: Amazon OpenSearch Service

NEW QUESTION # 297
A data scientist is using the Amazon SageMaker Neural Topic Model (NTM) algorithm to build a model that recommends tags from blog posts. The raw blog post data is stored in an Amazon S3 bucket in JSON format.
During model evaluation, the data scientist discovered that the model recommends certain stopwords such as
"a," "an," and "the" as tags to certain blog posts, along with a few rare words that are present only in certain blog entries. After a few iterations of tag review with the content team, the data scientist notices that the rare words are unusual but feasible. The data scientist also must ensure that the tag recommendations of the generated model do not include the stopwords.
What should the data scientist do to meet these requirements?

A. Use the SageMaker built-in Object Detection algorithm instead of the NTM algorithm for the training job to process the blog post data.
B. Use the Amazon Comprehend entity recognition API operations. Remove the detected words from the blog post data. Replace the blog post data source in the S3 bucket.
C. Remove the stop words from the blog post data by using the Count Vectorizer function in the scikit- learn library. Replace the blog post data in the S3 bucket with the results of the vectorizer.
D. Run the SageMaker built-in principal component analysis (PCA) algorithm with the blog post data from the S3 bucket as the data source. Replace the blog post data in the S3 bucket with the results of the training job.

Answer: C

Explanation:
The data scientist should remove the stop words from the blog post data by using the Count Vectorizer function in the scikit-learn library, and replace the blog post data in the S3 bucket with the results of the vectorizer. This is because:
* The Count Vectorizer function is a tool that can convert a collection of text documents to a matrix of token counts 1. It also enables the pre-processing of text data prior to generating the vector representation, such as removing accents, converting to lowercase, and filtering out stop words 1. By using this function, the data scientist can remove the stop words such as "a," "an," and "the" from the blog post data, and obtain a numerical representation of the text that can be used as input for the NTM algorithm.
* The NTM algorithm is a neural network-based topic modeling technique that can learn latent topics from a corpus of documents 2. It can be used to recommend tags from blog posts by finding the most probable topics for each document, and ranking the words associated with each topic 3. However, the NTM algorithm does not perform any text pre-processing by itself, so it relies on the quality of the input data. Therefore, the data scientist should replace the blog post data in the S3 bucket with the results of the vectorizer, to ensure that the NTM algorithm does not include the stop words in the tag recommendations.
* The other options are not suitable for the following reasons:
* Option A is not relevant because the Amazon Comprehend entity recognition API operations are used to detect and extract named entities from text, such as people, places, organizations, dates, etc4. This is not the same as removing stop words, which are common words that do not carry much meaning or information. Moreover, removing the detected entities from the blog post data may reduce the quality and diversity of the tag recommendations, as some entities may be relevant and useful as tags.
* Option B is not optimal because the SageMaker built-in principal component analysis (PCA) algorithm is used to reduce the dimensionality of a dataset by finding the most important features that capture the maximum amount of variance in the data 5. This is not the same as removing stop words, which are words that have low variance and high frequency in the data. Moreover, replacing the blog post data in the S3 bucket with the results of the PCA algorithm may not be compatible with the input format expected by the NTM algorithm, which requires a bag-of-words representation of the text 2.
* Option C is not suitable because the SageMaker built-in Object Detection algorithm is used to detect and localize objects in images 6. This is not related to the task of recommending tags from blog posts, which are text documents. Moreover, using the Object Detection algorithm instead of the NTM algorithm would require a different type of input data (images instead of text), and a different type of output data (bounding boxes and labels instead of topics and words).
Neural Topic Model (NTM) Algorithm
Introduction to the Amazon SageMaker Neural Topic Model
Amazon Comprehend - Entity Recognition
sklearn.feature_extraction.text.CountVectorizer
Principal Component Analysis (PCA) Algorithm
Object Detection Algorithm

NEW QUESTION # 298
......

We decided to research because we felt the pressure from competition. We must also pay attention to the social dynamics in the process of preparing for the AWS-Certified-Machine-Learning-Specialty exam. Experts at our AWS-Certified-Machine-Learning-Specialty simulating exam have been supplementing and adjusting the content of our products. So our AWS-Certified-Machine-Learning-Specialty Exam Questions are always the most accurate and authoritative. At the same time, our professional experts keep a close eye on the updating the AWS-Certified-Machine-Learning-Specialty study materials. That is why our AWS-Certified-Machine-Learning-Specialty training prep is the best seller on the market.

AWS-Certified-Machine-Learning-Specialty Valid Dump: https://www.pdftorrent.com/AWS-Certified-Machine-Learning-Specialty-exam-prep-dumps.html

DOWNLOAD the newest PDFTorrent AWS-Certified-Machine-Learning-Specialty PDF dumps from Cloud Storage for free: https://drive.google.com/open?id=1JAcxL9KDU4L7GZCdRGvhMrpOtSWIX0zf

0 Enrolled Courses

0 Active Courses

0 Completed Courses

0 Total Students

0 Total Courses

0 Total Reviews

Howdy, I'm Don Bell Don Bell

About Me